abstract

• © 2020 CEUR-WS. All rights reserved. We advance an alternative version of the Chisholm Paradox and we argue that the alternative version (while logically equivalent to the original version), in its manifestation in the natural language, is not intuitively consistent. The alternative version of the paradox suggests some requirements for deontic logics designed for legal reasoning.

authors

• Governatori, Guido

status

• published 

publication date

• January 1, 2020

published in

• CEUR Workshop Proceedings  Journal

presented at event

• Workshop on `MIning and REasoning with Legal texts (MIREL) (2019)  Conference

Publisher

• CEUR-WS.org

start page

• 1

end page

• 7

volume

• 2632